Wednesday, July 29, 2015

Real Estate Advertising Analysis - Madison WI


Reader feedback goes a long way with me. As a result, I’m going to share even more of our market research geared toward reviewing advertisements by market and doing some comparison analysis.

 

Our market research of advertising and marketing of single family homes in the Madison WI area shows that realty agents are doing a slightly above average job in comparison, with good possibilities for improvement in the near future.

 


 

The listings reviewed are each three bedroom one bath single family houses (in Dane County) priced between $100,000 and $200,000, which range from fixers to ideal at the low and high end.

 

Upon doing a random search, based on Dane County 3 + 1 in the $100,000 to $200,000 price range, we reviewed the first five homes shown with this criteria starting at the low end of $100,000 and then the first five working down from $200,000 to $159,900. These advertisements are then compared against each other (in same range) and then against the ads for the other price range within the same area.

 

$100,000 to $110,000:

 

#1) 140 South St, Sun Prairie, $104,900 1,583 square feet

 


 

The photo spread exterior shot shows the big yard, which, however, makes the house look distant. The interior photos show too much of the bare floors, some with debris on them, in empty rooms. Combined, these photos make the reader want to keep his/her distance and fear for walking inside onto bare floors.

 

The description copy tries to counteract the photos, admitting the home “has flaws”, and highlighting “Tons of great features, covered front porch, main floor office & laundry….”, etc.

 

However, this home has more square footage than four of the five properties we reviewed which are priced between $50,000 and $90,000 higher and in the same region. A more flattering photo spread and minor copy revisions needed.

 

#2) 209 North St. Madison $104,900   1,575 square feet

 


 

 

Although the intent is there with this advertisement, the primary photo showing the wood porch and railings which do not match the color of the exterior kill the initial appeal. The description copy includes “Great opportunity for sweat equity or investment…”, which is fine. However, the copy begins with “Back on market, buyer finance fell thru”.

 

While we understand the desire to show the reason for ‘back on the market’, it should not be given as a priority. A “new” ad should be attracting “new” potential buyers who would not have known this is at least a 2nd attempt to sell the listing. To address those who have seen this property advertised previously, show an upgrade, improvement, or added feature not included in a previous ad instead.

 

 

#3) 549 State Farm Rd. Deerfield  $109,000   1,824 square feet

 


 

By far the largest home in terms of square footage in this group, but the advertisement fails to live up to this advantage.

 

The primary photo has blocked out part of a real estate sign, giving out a “this is an edited photo” message, as well as looking like the back of the home behind a tree and phone pole.

 

If anyone bothers to proceed and read the description copy, they would see more negative information, such as “Property was built prior to 1978 and lead-based paint potentially exists.”

 

Of course, the lead-based paint possibility should be disclosed under these circumstances. This, however, should have been addressed before an advertisement went public. Having an inspection to determine whether or not this issue exists would have been huge. If an inspection showed no lead-based paint, it could have been pointed out and made into a positive! If there definitely is a presence, the ad could state something like “Get the lead-based paint out and get a bargain in return!”.

 

Why? Because at an estimated 1,824 square feet, this home is also bigger than the five property advertisements we analyzed costing up to $90,000 more. Showing a definitive result tells a potential investor how much they could profit by fixing up, or what a bargain this is if they don’t have to deal with the paint issue. As it shows now (as of press time), this ad tells a potential buyer they have a major headache to deal with if they still want the home.

 

What might have been!

 



#4) 116 Cherokee Dr.    $109,900  1,374 square feet

 


 

If only the photo spread and the description copy were coordinated, this would be the best advertisement within the group.

 

The primary photo is very good, making this home appear larger than three of the other four properties within this $10,000 range even though it is not. Most of the remainder of the spread is quite flattering to the home.

 

However, the description copy starts with “Lake access home on 3 lots, have the rights but not the cost and enjoy the lake.” The “however” is that it isn’t until the final two photos that a potential buyer can see any evidence of a lake, and that is if he/she is still clicking away.

 

Either the copy needs to feature “Plenty of room with easy lake access” or the photo spread needs to show at least one picture showing both the house and the lake with a much better angle. This property is a good value compared with a couple of the ones priced much higher, but a conflicting advertisement does not convey the best message.

 

 

#5) 1738 Baird Street Madison   $109,900  932 square feet

 


 

This advertisement pulls down the others. The photo spread needs to be re-shot. The primary photo, even with the yard and garden, is at an angle that makes the house look small, even though it really is. The 2nd photo makes the 2-car detached garage appear to be larger than the entire house. Ouch. What hurts even more is that the remaining photos of the interior are very good and quite flattering. Removing the first two exterior photos would make a huge difference with this home.

 

The description copy wisely promotes the ability to bike or walk downtown or to campus, and (at press time) upcoming open houses. However, the copy included “Offers will be presented to seller Sunday evening”. While we realize the intent of urgency, this also tells an interested party that there is no rush to see the home ahead of time since an offer might not be considered ahead of time.

 

Especially when a potential buyer can easily find four other 3 + 1 homes for the same or a few thousand dollars less within seconds.

 

 

FROM $200,000 to $159,000:

 

#1) 5202 Kevins Way Madison  $200,000   1,644 square feet

 


 

 

This one is clearly the best advertisement of this group of ten. While the primary photo is slightly off angel, the 25 photos in the spread are excellent, flattering each room throughout the interior.

 

The description copy starts well with the “updated home in a desirable neighborhood” approach, while the “Well cared for by this owner of 31 years” is an excellent selling point. This combines to give potential buyers solid reasons to pay the same or more than comparable listings in the area, which the majority of these other ads do not.

 

 

#2) 108 N Jefferson St. Verona   $200,000   1,309 sq feet

 

 


 

Ad needs some touching up to be effective. The primary photo features the yard, which in turn makes the house seem distant. The description copy hits “Charming ranch home is the best value in the Verona area” but offers nothing to compare.

 

While the description copy does support the current primary photos by mentioning the yard and patio first, the photo spread further in features a very impressive interior, which appears to be an even better selling point.

 

This advertisement needs to feature the interior as the strong selling point, especially when you consider that three of five home ads we reviewed listed for at least $90,000 LESS, have more square footage.

 

 

 

#3) 3629 Dennett Dr.  Madison   $200,000   1,392 square feet 

 


 

Has a good primary photo and photo spread, even if it makes the home appear smaller. Only critique on this ad is that both the description copy and the photo spread could have more emphasis on the interior.

 

 

 

#4)  2415 Allied Dr. Madison  $199,900   1,450 square feet

 


 

In one word, this ad is “careless”. Not one actual photo, yet the description copy says this home was “built in 2014”, and this is July 2015. The description copy also promotes “Open House at Sales Center”, as if this ad has given anyone even the slightest hint of a reason why they should follow up. Especially when the same area has larger homes available for more than $90,000 less.

 

There is nothing in this ad to make this home distinct in any way, nor do we know if there is still a warranty or what condition it is in.

 

 

#5) 112 Bresland Ct. Madison   $199,900      1,110 square feet

 


 

More carelessness with this ad, in addition to two of the photos (including the primary one) showing a car in the driveway. Another of the photos shows grass growing at the garage door, which makes this property appear poorly groomed. The last of the (only) five photos shows some sort of street view with no description of what or why it is included.

 

The description copy includes “needs extensive work/remodeling”, while this home is at approximately 1,100 square feet, while priced at or above every other home in this analysis.

 

This listing office generally does better with promoting its listings. A check of the company web site produced a separate 3 + 1 home with unique features and a nice photo spread listed at $40,000 LESS:

 


 

However, consumers are far less likely to pursue a company web site after seeing ads as poor as the Bresland Ct. one, especially at the higher price.

 

 

NOTE: This survey is based on researching listed properties for Dane County (in which Madison is the largest municipality) via the WisconsinHomes .com site during the week of July 20 through 24, 2015. First In Promotions Inc., which provides the research, has no affiliation with WisconsinHomes nor are any of the listing agents or specific offices representing the various analyzed property advertisements current clients of First In Promotions Inc. This information demonstrated for research purposes only, and is not guaranteed to be accurate or current beyond July 24, 2015.

 

Our full reports for Madison and other markets recently surveyed by First In Promotions, both for our clients and independently, may be available to qualified realty agents and companies. Contact us if interested.

 

 

 

Monday, June 22, 2015

Phil Collins Helps To Drum Up Real Estate Business

The story may seem more like one of those entertainment blurbs and celebrity news, but the story about musician Phil Collins purchasing a mansion formerly owned by Jennifer Lopez is an important one for the real estate industry.


Never mind the entertainer aspect of this. The key point to the story is that the most recent owner spent a lot of money to upgrade and renovate the home, and sold it for a profit of millions of dollars in the process.


We must not overlook the key point that the seller increased the value of the home and sold it for much more than he purchased it for within the past ten years.


After constant stories about sellers losing money, or at best breaking even, on the sale of their homes, it is encouraging to know that the possibility of home owners once again being able to profit from their investment just might be on the comeback trail!






http://www.wsj.com/articles/phil-collins-buys-miami-beach-mansion-once-owned-by-jennifer-lopez-for-33-million-1434462849 



Tuesday, May 12, 2015

How NBA Star Kevin Durant Has Helped The Real Estate Market

While it is safe to say that the majority of us don't care what superstar pro athletes do with all of their money, this week's news is an exception to real estate owners and those who depend upon the industry for their income.


Way to go, Kevin Durant. This time, it's not because of his play on the basketball court. The sale of his Miami area multi-million dollar penthouse brings us what is truly the best possible real estate news. This is positive for all of us.


The fact is that Durant's penthouse has been sold for approximately $3,125,000. What makes this so special is that Durant purchased it back in 2011 - for $1,325,000 LESS than what he just sold it for only four years later!


This 3,800 square foot estate was put on the market earlier this year at $3,450,000. In this instance, I can't criticize the seller for accepting $125,000 less than the asking price. Not when the profit comes to more than $1.3 million over four years.


If it were up to me, this should be the lead story in every real estate related news source for the entire week. Here is why.


Stories like this one were commonplace for years. However, in recent times the number of distressed properties sold for lowball prices has destroyed this from happening in the majority of cases.


We need MORE stories such as this one. A seller made a handsome profit on a property purchased and upgraded over a four year period. Shows it actually can be done, even in today's market.


For a change, an agent didn't say "It won't sell for that much. You need to price it below what you paid for it!". Some appraiser didn't bring in comps using short sales of large mansions to make it appear that Durant's property had not increased in value. Yay!


Real estate needs to be made into an investment with promise once again. Those who are sitting there trying to come up with reasons why home ownership has declined over the past five years need to read this column again. If consumers had the legitimate chance to turn a profit within five to ten years (like it used to be) I'm here to tell you home sales would be back up again.


In the spirit of Kevin Durant, it would be a slam dunk.




http://www.latimes.com/business/realestate/hot-property/la-fi-hotprop-kevin-durant-penthouse-20150511-story.html













Friday, May 8, 2015

The Latest In Conflicting Home Sale Research

The barrage of  "half full" vs. "half empty" opinions and statistics regarding the current home sales market continues, while the problem isn't any closer to being fixed.


A new report by Fitch Ratings, which reviews current home prices in markets around the country, shows that home prices in Texas "are 11% overvalued". Specifics include claims that Austin and Houston are "overheated by almost 20%".


In a separate report issued by Arch Mortgage Insurance Company claims that "Texas has a nearly 33% chance of a housing decline", and puts the Dallas/Ft. Worth Metroplex and San Antonio first on its list of cities with "moderate" risk for a softening.


 
This Arch report adds North Dakota and Oklahoma among its other "moderate risk" states. Because of its direct involvement with home sales around the country, this report has some meaning, adding to the "half empty" scenario.


Both of these reports were the primary elements of a story in the Dallas Morning News earlier this week, which is quite understandable. And that's the rub here.


On the very same online page with this story is the first "other news" story to be linked to. The headline on it reads, "Dallas/Ft. Worth Housing Market Rated Hottest In the Nation by Realtor.com".


According to that story, Texas home sales "rose by more than 4% in the first quarter of 2015". It then goes on to say that the increase comes as the inventory of available properties "dropped to an all-time low" in the latest report from the Texas Association of Realtors.




There you have it. From the same link on a newspaper web site, we see two sources showing doom and gloom, while two others show a most positive spin.




What do I think? I'm sticking with what I consider to be more important facts. Such as this being the month of May, and that I'm still finding photos of available homes for sale in the northeast part of the country with piles of snow in the photos.


While I look at those, others sit and wonder why those homes aren't selling at all, or fetching the prices they once did.  












http://bizbeatblog.dallasnews.com/2015/05/texas-dallas-fort-worth-home-prices-are-significantly-overvalued-analyst-warns.html/

Wednesday, April 29, 2015

Buffalo Still Lost In The Shuffle

Here we are in "spring market" and with May almost here we are closing in on six months since the severe snow storm which crippled the Buffalo area in November. The temperature in Buffalo at press time was 51 degrees.


Time to follow up and see how the local real estate market is presenting itself. I went on through the Buffalo News web site, chose a price range of "homes for sale", waiting to see how 'with it' the agents are in terms of promoting available properties.


If only my findings were anywhere near what I hoped for. Or, if I was a seller in the Buffalo area, what I would expect. Instead, the advertising is still as much of a disaster as the snow storms.


The first ten properties came up. As usual, the primary photo is the first impression. On April 29th, TWO listings showed primary photos with snow on the ground. The one at 11 Cedarbrook Drive in 
Lancaster, New York showed a huge pile of snow engulfing the home. On April 29th??


Three other properties (in just this one price range!) had either no photo at all or a generic one which had nothing to do with the properties they represent. Total those up, and my random search starting at $225,000 for 2+ bedrooms came up with HALF of the first web page of properties starting with a bad impression.


Just as I pointed out the same week after the big storm hit, the technology is in place to be able to update photos and property information with regard to weather and other factors which impact the potential sale of homes. Those homes on streets which were plowed and/or had easy access to grocery stores and other necessities should have had updated information to demonstrate that to potential buyers that very week.


However, seeing this poor representation literally months later for the same area has no excuse. Those ten listings I looked at are from a variety of local realty offices and agents. Even the "good" ads for homes for sale get tarnished when a potential buyer sees snow covered lawns and careless generic photos for a first impression.


What makes this even more insane is that the Cedarbrook Drive property is shown with "PRICE REDUCTION" as the headline. So let's get this straight. The home with a primary photo (at the end of April) showing it surrounded by piles of snow and with "Large front porch perfect for warm weather relaxation" in the description copy hasn't sold at a higher price.


Because of this, that seller is "forced" to accept less money?


This listing is just one example out of thousands where poor advertising and marketing is the culprit. However, it is not just this seller that loses out. Thousands of other home owners lose out because of crap like this.


If and as the Cedarbrook Drive home sells for less money, it will serve to lower the value of nearby homes, and so goes the cycle. Long time home owners then lose out on money they should be entitled to because some agents don't bother keeping their listing advertisements up to date.


Something needs to be done about this.




http://listing.realestate.buffalonews.com/sales/detail/350-l-1245-b468496/11-cedarbrook-dr-lancaster-ny-14086



Thursday, April 23, 2015

Home Sales Statistics Don't Lie..... They Disagree

The one real estate statistic I believe hasn't been proven yet. But I think it is safe to estimate that at least 99% of consumers do not make purchase or selling decisions based on the market statistics they read.


Within the past 24 hours (at press time), we have had another set of examples that you can believe what you prefer to believe.


Last night, the National Association of Home Builders issued a "story" about how much existing home sales have risen this year, especially in March (2015) when compared with previous months and with March of 2014.


The story tells us how first-time buyer shares have increased, how there is more inventory than in recent months, and how the number of distressed home sales have dropped.


The very next morning, the Associated Press published a story headlined "New home sales collapsed in March".


Although the AP story also reports that new home sales were higher, the very same story also says new home sales dropped 33% percent in the Northeast and 15.8% percent in the South. And that the median sales price fell 1.7% since March 2014.




Seeing these "stories" within hours of each other makes me feel the same way as the times I received those "Now is the time to sell!" mailers and e-mails from real estate agents at the same as my home was more than $100,000 underwater.


For the millions who cannot buy or sell a home due to circumstances beyond their control, this arranging of information is in the same category as the drug commercials with potential side effects much worse than the purpose of the drug.


Unfortunately, this is how it goes in real estate these days. Too many people working statistics in their favor and not enough of them concentrating on actually fixing the market.




http://eyeonhousing.org/2015/04/spring-for-existing-home-sales-in-america/


http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-new-home-sales-20150423-story.html



Tuesday, April 14, 2015

How To Sell The Only House In Town

Suppose you had the only residential listing in town. Would it would "sell itself"? Some realty agents seem to think so. That is not how it works.


As of the week of this post, the home at 100 N. 5th Street in Beaver Creek MN was literally the ONLY house for sale listed for the entire town, according to Realtor.com as well as Homes.com. Even the "nearby homes for sale" feature on these sites did not have any other Beaver Creek properties.


This 3 bedroom home had been on the market for more than one and one-half months at press time. If the law of supply and demand truly applied to real estate, this home would have been long gone.


What makes this even more interesting is that the advertising copy is very well written, and includes a lot of positive and helpful information about the property. Recent upgrades are profiled and the spacious elements of the home are featured.


There was a 14 photo spread with the majority being flattering interior photos (as of press time). It is possible that not having updated the exterior photos is a slight negative. There was still some snow on the ground on them even though the temperature for the current week was in the mid-60's. It is possible that the interior photos revealing that the sellers appear to be devoted to their religion could be preventing potential buyers from inquiring, but the majority of potential buyers would be making changes to decorations and art work anyway.


Another selling point should be that it is the only residence in town for sale. That should indicate a motivated seller. This is different than being on a block lined with "For Sale" signs and a massive exodus from a community.




Why hasn't this house sold? Why is this one now the only one in town on the market?


It is because, even with the favorable copy describing the home, potential buyers also need to be sold on the surroundings. And, in this instance, they are not.




The population of Beaver Creek is less than 1,000 people. There are no "true" towns with residences which border it.


Chances are, with this home having been on the market for close to two months, that everybody else in town knows it is for sale, and no one local has stepped up to buy it. This translate into needing to bring in a buyer from another community.


However, there is NOTHING in the advertisement profile of this property which gives anyone one or more reasons to consider Beaver Creek. This is why this house hasn't sold - and why it will not "sell itself".


It seems that Beaver Creek is right there at an exit from I-90, while being less than a 30 minute drive from much larger Sioux City SD. Thus, a family could be, say, 20 minutes away from employment, shopping, and the amenities of a bigger town.


In addition, there are reasons that people that live in Beaver Creek live there and enjoy the community (since none of them are looking to move!).


A few well chosen words about WHY potential buyers should consider Beaver Creek would go a long way toward getting this house sold. Perhaps to a buyer who is looking in Sioux Falls and would consider the "right" home a few minutes away.


It is not "just" the house. It is, often times, the reason to live there, that can make a difference. This house won't sell itself until there are specific reasons to consider it.






http://www.homes.com/property/100-n-5th-st-beaver-creek-mn-56116/id-600037077741/

Thursday, March 12, 2015

Make A Boston Open House A Free Ride

If you are a home seller in the Boston area that has listed or (plans to list) your home for sale within the next 30 days, and if your home is located with 1/2 mile of an MBTA station, a little research can go a long way toward getting your home sold.


The MBTA (commuter train system serving the Boston region) has announced a "free fare day" for Friday April 24th. The reasons do not matter to you, but you should know how to benefit from them.


Let me back track. While it is true that sellers do not plan open houses, you (as a seller) should not let your listing agent stand in the way. Some agents are against open houses, and have their reasons. Many will hold them, but for the wrong reasons (for your purpose). Often times the agents hold an open house to meet the neighbors and "general" house shoppers so that they can interest them in "any" listing once they find out that your home is not a fit. You, however, hire that agent to sell YOUR home.


For those agents fortunate enough to have a listing within 1/2 mile of those train stations, drop everything (except for an offer, of course) and schedule an open house for Friday April 24th from, say, 3 to 7 PM. Impress the heck out of your seller! 


Here is why. This is a widely used commuter train line providing "free" rides that day. Your listing is within a reasonable walking distance. Think about it. This means that on that day, every commuter in the Boston metro area could take the train without cost and walk to your open house!


Those potential buyers could know for certain how long of a commute they would have, as well as the convenience of being able to walk to and from the train. He/she/they could see first hand what the neighborhood is like at an important time of the day. Maybe they can walk past a grocery store or trendy restaurant in the process, or see the school yard nearby.


Not every agent agrees with me on this in general, but from where I sit you gain another huge advantage by doing this. While other agents balk at this suggestion and maybe hold a nearby open house during the "usual" Saturday or Sunday afternoon period, chances are yours would be the ONLY available home these potential buyers would be able to see during their "free" trip to see your listing. Your listing, therefore, would not be "one of several" homes these people would visit and have them run together.


Promotions such as this (the MTBA special) are rarely announced this far enough in advance. This gives you plenty of time to plan your open house and to advertise and promote it in the right places.


"Take a FREE train ride to and from 123 First Street on April 24th and explore this 3-bedroom 2-bath home...."


Everyone that comes will ONLY be coming to view this home, since it is likely that there would not be any others in that area.


I mention all of this for those not in the Boston area. The idea is to always be on the lookout for unique opportunities such as this, and make it special. Every home is unique for one or more reasons. The more you can do to sell its uniqueness, the more successful you will be at selling homes.






http://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2015/03/11/mbta-refunds-wednesday/l2BLsx0EZpe3vgmQ4woJxN/story.html






Dave Kohl is Marketing Director of First In Promotions, which provides market research for realty agents and offices on a per hour or per property basis. Details at www.ForRealEstateAgentsOnly.

Friday, February 27, 2015

People Don't Buy Homes Based On Sales Statistics

The Metro Study people do an excellent job with interpreting and reporting on home sales and many things real estate related, but their latest findings for the Northern Virginia housing market is another prime example of how much is too much.


This report shows that, for part or all of 2014, new home construction was down but used home sales were up; while the number of overall home sales were down, yet the median price was up.


We can take statistics like these and make a case for just about anything, and that is the problem. For now, let's take real estate investors out of the equation and focus on consumers purchasing a home for their own use.


Quick. How many people, including yourself, do you know who have read market statistics and THEN decided to purchase a home? 


If you answered more than zero, I'd be extremely surprised. Seems to me that personal preference plays an even bigger role.


However, many of the so-called experts choose the statistics which best fit their approach and run with them, which overall is not helping when it comes to real estate. Maybe it does in pro sports, for example, when the team negotiates by illustrating only those statistics which shows a player in a less productive light while the agent has every statistic to show that player in every superior and productive category.


You can't take statistics like these and make it appear that "people are buying pre-owned homes instead of new ones" based on sales over the past two years. Yet, I am not arguing against that while pointing out that new construction is down.


It so happens that I had the experience of watching my current home being built, and I know a couple, married for 35 years, which has moved into new construction every time. I could also name other friends and family members who would "never go with new construction because there are always problems".


Official statistics are NOT necessarily a true reflection of the pulse of a local real estate market, even though they are too often "reported" as if they are. But neither is the barrage of comparative statistics.


Let's use the Northern VA report as an example. Metro Study reports that Northern Virginia MLS sales numbered 38,691 units for 2014. That looks quite impressive. Then you read that this sales number is down 6 percent from the previous year. The 6% decrease makes it appear to some that the desire to move to or within this same area is reduced. So is this a good or a bad report?






http://www.metrostudyreport.com/sequestration-made-for-a-weak-2014-indicators-for-2015-are-up/

Thursday, February 5, 2015

And Snow It Goes

Still another example of why sellers need to take charge of how their agents are presenting their properties, even with all due respect to a lot of realty agents out there.


The Chicago area has literally had more than 21 inches of snow within the past week, at the time of this writing. Many of the side streets and secondary streets within the city and its suburb are still being cleared for traffic even though there has been no "new" snowfall in 48 hours. Of course, technology hasn't stopped through all of this. The ability to upload and update advertisements and data about new and currently listed properties is the same as it was just a week ago.


As I so often do following a major storm or significant event impacting a geographic area, I check on homes for sale in the impacted area days later to see how many agents representing sellers have updated their advertising and promotion to focus on the true current status.


Even in a competitive market like Chicago, a search of 50 properties within the same general price range did not show ANY references to the recent storm.


This is such a major opportunity to promote a listing on a street where, for example, it was plowed and safe for travel right away and/or something like "streets clear to train station" or "easy snow plow access". Something to tell a potential buyer that it is easier to deal with the big storm for this home than other properties in the area might be.


Here is one specific example, which, prior to clicking to the full property details, shows as "JUST LISTED", at 5654 W. Grace Street in Chicago.


The primary photo of the home shows (again, the same week as 21 inches of snow have fallen) an exterior shot showing the lawn and a nice floral arrangement. JUST LISTED??


Sorry, but right there the credibility is shot. If this home really is "just listed", why was the primary photo clearly taken MONTHS earlier?


Not only is there zero mention of winter or the storm, but the description includes "Lovely deck and backyard for entertaining!" within the copy. Considering that the outdoor temperature had not been above 32 degrees within the past five days (at the time of this writing), I'm not sure this is the best sentence to tempt an immediate response.


Granted, the seller of this home is not responsible for having this advertisement (on a nationally available real estate web site) appear this way.


If that were my property, I would be livid at the agent. If a potential buyer can access this advertisement while the snow is piled up, the agent placing this advertisement can be making sure it is up to the minute, or pull it if the advertising source can't deliver.


Upon looking at the numerous interior photos taken from good angles, this is an impressive property. However, potential buyers seeing the clearly outdated photo and about the "lovely deck and backyard" (and back yard is actually two words, by the way) are more likely to ridicule this advertisement and click on to the next property matching their search criteria.


A little common sense could help the sale of properties even more than the prices and the interest rates.






http://www.homes.com/property/5654-w-grace-st-chicago-il-60634/id-600013188315/

Thursday, December 18, 2014

The Big Banks Still Not Helping

Here we are one year after the big banks succeeded in their efforts to reduce the number of mortgage brokers and add to the challenges many consumers have when it comes to getting a mortgage.


Think it has made a difference for consumers? Then get this. Wells Fargo has MORE deposit revenue in recent months. How does it respond? By issuing FEWER mortgage loans:

https://confoundedinterest.wordpress.com/2014/12/18/wells-fargo-leads-banks-in-deposits-but-still-lending-less-on-residential-mortgages-swiss-national-bank-introducing-negative-deposit-rates-of-0-25/


During the same time period, the real estate market in California, one of the most monitored states in the country, has taken still another dip:

https://confoundedinterest.wordpress.com/2014/12/17/death-valley-days-mortgage-purchase-applications-continue-to-decline-despite-looser-lending-standards/


Along these same lines, another major monitored state, Florida, maintains a high level of cash buyers:

http://nationalmortgageprofessional.com/news/51847/cash-share-home-sales-falls-year-over-year-21st-consecutive-month


At the same time, Florida has one more of its politicians in "action":

http://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/crime/article4523011.html


While all of this is going on, there are still millions of home owners whose homes are considered to have LOST value, even though many have been well maintained and/or bolstered by home improvement projects.

Although I can't speak for other home owners (as much as I would like to!), I would suggest that home owners give a lot of thought to where they deposit their money these days.

Wednesday, December 3, 2014

Home More Than Double The Price In Same Zip Code?

What happens when two 3-bedroom homes in the same zip code are listed and one is more than double the asking price? From what we see, nothing in more than four months.

Let's compare these two listings, as they appear simultaneously on Realtor.com, located within the same zip code and same school districts, in Stevens Point WI.

1409 4th Ave. is a 3-bed 2-bath home listed at $103,900. Again, within the same zip code, 175 Old Wausau Rd. , a 3-bedroom 2 1/2-bath home, is listed at $239,000. Small town, large discrepancy!

This situation helps to demonstrate the importance of presenting each property as unique and being willing and able to make comparisons against "competing" homes. These two homes are listed by separate local realty offices, and have each been on the market for more than four months (at press time).

The issue of "location location location" is reduced because these are, again, same zip code and schools for both. For those shopping by price, one would think that the high and low end of the price spectrum would produce some activity for both. Some potential buyers will look at the lowest priced home to see what they get "for less", while those in a better financial position might at least consider the degree of luxury available for more than twice the price.

Both of these homes have unique selling points and positives which we can see from the respective advertisements as they appear on the same web site and within the same local search (3 bedroom 2 bath in zip 54481).

It is no longer a matter of putting up the advertising information and forgetting about it until or unless a potential buyer comes along. At least, it shouldn't be. These are prime examples of why property ads need to be adjusted and/or updated to adapt to the very latest in the market. Neither of these ads do.

The "overview" description copy for 1409 4th Ave. makes no mention of being the lowest priced 3-bedroom home in the area on the days that we searched. The copy does highlight several positives, such as the updated kitchen and finished lower level, along with specifics about the location and nearby amenities.

In this instance, the "updated kitchen" takes on added significance if compared to the Old Wausau Rd. listing, which mentions only "dishwasher" for appliances and shows only one photo of a cramped kitchen for more than double the price! Wouldn't you like to know that you could get a larger and more updated kitchen in the same area for over $100,000 LESS?

Yet, unless a potential buyer does that comparison (and it is not likely with that large of a price spread), that selling point goes untouched.

So why is the lowest priced home still available after more than four months?

The answer could be in the photo spread. Every interior photo shows a significantly brighter light from a window dominating the picture. This only serves to make this home appear dark and dreary inside. These are not professional photos, and that hurts big time. We see clutter on tables and shelves. The even bigger "no no" is that the garage photo not only shows a parked car, but we can read the license plate on it. (This is severely frowned upon by agents due to security reasons.) Again, this listing has been online for more than four months!

Also in the photo spread are hand written instructions above the laundry room sink, a blurred photo, a portable fan (which makes us wonder about ventilation in warmer temperatures), and what appears to be a very tiny bathroom. Frankly, these photos do nothing but make this property appear to look like the lowest priced 3-bedroom home in the area, and could scare off a potential buyer.

Why hasn't the higher priced home sold in more than six months?

Granted, it could be the higher price, although this home being on over 3 acres with a pond, garden, and a separate "heated" shop located near the river provides a strong indication of why due to the amount of space and land value.

However, the photo spread of 26 pictures includes on seven interior shots, including just one of what appears to be a tiny kitchen area. The other interior shots make the rooms look small. The message this photo spread sends is that this is for someone who wants to live in the great outdoors, enjoy the yard, the garden, the pond, and the land.

Let's also keep in mind that these photos all show green grass and a garden and sunny days. These photos that appear in this ad during December in a town in Central Wisconsin, where the average temperature is below freezing this time of year. For someone to pay a higher price for a 3-bedroom home in this area, they should get a better idea of living there during the four months (minimum) of the year that the outdoors isn't feasible.

It is not the location. It is not the price, since we went to extremes. It is the same story for two much different properties. One that needs to be updated.


http://www.realtor.com/realestateandhomes-detail/1409-4th-Ave_Stevens-Point_WI_54481_M84480-37444?row=20

http://www.realtor.com/realestateandhomes-detail/175-Old-Wausau-Rd_Stevens-Point_WI_54481_M72022-18734?row=86



Tuesday, November 25, 2014

A "Snow Job" For Buffalo Real Estate

Realty agents and sellers still need to have the term "crisis management" enter into their thinking at all times. It makes things appear even worse when a "negative" event goes all but ignored.

This week, I'm using Buffalo NY as a prime example. Obviously, the massive snowstorm is devastating for the local residents and the economy regardless of the coincidental challenges of the real estate market.

I asked, "Who would want to buy a house right now in Buffalo?". My answer is "investors that figure they could get some lowball offers accepted by frustrated residents looking to get out of town ASAP". The snow will melt, whether with flood damage or not, and at some point soon the community will return to normal life. Not everybody will want to wait for that to happen.

Then, I asked, as should realty agents, "What can be done to sell houses in Buffalo right now?". I'll grant you there is no certain answer. But there needs to be an effort. One has to think that there will be plenty of folks looking to abandon ship and relocate.

My next step was to go on to Realtor.com, and do a search for "New Listings" for Buffalo NY. This search produced more than 1,800 listings, including several pages of homes which were put on the market since the monster storm hit.

Next, I went through the first (and most recent) 50 listings which came up on the search, including a variety of price ranges. From an advertising and marketing standpoint, these findings were extremely disappointing.

Agents may not be able to drive to visit their sellers or even get to their office yet, but they most certainly can access and update their listings and information online. One of the few things this storm did not stop is technology. At least it shouldn't be.

Information about these newly available homes should be updated to INCLUDE the impact of the weather, especially when positive. Ignorning it would only make an investor skeptical at this point.

As we all know, the primary photo is a huge part of the first impression of any property ad. Yet, incredible as it is, 28 of the 50 primary photos (that's the majority!) did not show snow. Combine that with 18 others with no photo and a "Coming Soon" poster. Say what?

Hours after an historic snowfall stops the city, the majority of the photos do not show or even mention the storm. Sure enough, only four out of 50 photos showed more than either a lawn or a little bit of snow.

Of course, I explored those four listing ads more closely. The first (and most recent one put on the market at the time) did it the right way. The photo with mountains of snow on the lawn also revealed a plowed driveway leading to the garage, and announces that there will be an open house on Sunday (Nov. 29th) at 86 Garry Drive in West Seneca.

Before I even researched other similar properties in the area, this home already has a signficant edge by providing the impression that potential buyers can get to this house and see it with no problem (if and when they can get to the neighborhood, but that's not the point).

More importantly, this photo reveals that the roof has a minimal amount of snow on it, removing one of the upcoming dangers of a collapse. This tells all comers that the owners have clearly taken steps toward maintaining the property under pressure - while surrounding homes are not even close to showing anything nearly as reassuring.

Only one of the other "snow photo" properties showed a path to the front door and minimal snow still on the roof. The other two homes which showed massive amounts of snow in the primary photo had something else in common.

The interior photos of both properties reveal that they are empty! While showing the huge snow and a path to the door would normally be a positive, the showing that these homes are empty while the threat of flooding, leaking, and other storm related problems are even greater is a significant deterrent for any potential buyer.

Agents do (or should) have the ability to update their advertising information, and it is so important under these conditions. I should have been reading about which homes are on "freshly plowed streets" or that "(name of grocery store) is steps away", and other such pertinent information that shows that if I lived there and a major snow storm hits in the future that I would fare better than a similar home in another area.

However, not attacking this concern for 48 out of 50 properties is a poor reflection on the market and hurts everyone looking to sell in that region. The message coming from a Buffalo area property search should be that "the storm is not going to stop us". Instead, potential buyers are getting a different type of 'snow job'.

Oh, and here is the link to that home on Garry Drive:

http://www.realtor.com/realestateandhomes-detail/86-Garry-Dr_West-Seneca_NY_14224_M30430-75369?row=11