All things
considered, Rent Control has its purpose, which should be to prevent outlandish
rent increases. However, as discussed in this series, the current format
enables some landlords and tenants to take advantage of the situation.
Not being able
to increase the rent for “current” tenants often leads to lesser living
conditions for tenants and savings and tax advantages for landlords. The larger
scale impact is often the prevention or limitation of neighborhood growth
and/or improved property values.
One solution
for Rent Control is to allow for small percentage increases on an annual or
bi-annual basis, with specified standards being met in order to do so.
For example, a
10 or more unit apartment building could increase 5% every two years (for
continuing tenants) upon proof that landscape upgrades were installed. This
concept would help to assure that upgrades and improvements are part of rental
facilities. Perhaps meeting specified safety requirements could impact a
landlord’s ability to raise the rent.
To take this a
step further, a reduction in or maintaining low levels of crime or vandalism
statistics could be a reason for a rent increase to existing tenants. Many
tenants would be willing to pay extra with the knowledge that their overall
safety is a consideration.
As it stands
now, this is not always about creating or maintaining affordable housing. This
all feeds in to the “renting vs. buying” debate in many communities. Some
people look at having a Fixed Rate mortgage as a form of Rent Control, keeping
the resident at the same rate for up to 30 years. One important difference is
that the home owner chose the monthly payment based on the price of the
property and their financial status at or after the time of purchase. Apartment
living, however, could be due to geographic, financial, or logistical concerns.
Our hope is
that more states or municipalities considering implementation will look at ways
to modify existing regulations and learn from other parts of the country. The
system needs to be changed before it should be expanded.
No comments:
Post a Comment